AI Rate Professor

Design

Byong Park

ARTD15A · ARTD15DRAW · ART15A · ART20D · 2DDESIGN · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you already draw well and can self-advocate; expect uneven clarity and favorites.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPlays FavoritesUnclear DirectionsProject HeavyGreat Eye for ArtSoft Spoken
  • some praise creativity and critique, others cite favorites and .
  • Workload can .
  • ; students report B grades despite liking the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students report B grades and hard-to-gauge marking rather than free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Average difficulty is moderate; content is art-studio skill building rather than brain-burner theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but absences affected at least one grade and she missed some meetings herself.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some call her a great art teacher; , and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Loved work still got a B for some; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple students note heavy project load and want one fewer project.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Strong creative coaching and critique for some; and hard-to-hear delivery for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Studio projects and critiques dominate; no exam-focused comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Studio art classes with uneven clarity, occasional strong creative coaching, favorites complaints, and heavy projects.

Main concern

, and perceived favoritism make grades hard to predict.

What students said

“ and hard to hear. so it is hard to improve”
ARTD15A
“If you're interested in art and !”
ART15A
“ .”
ART20D

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on art projects and critique rather than formal exams.

Project BasedStudio Critique

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe project crunch and critique, not formal proctored exams.

Project BasedStudio Critique
“ .”
ART20D
“she has a great eye for what to improve on in your work”
ART15A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and hard to hear. so it is hard to improve”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010; credibility Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Park is a great art instructor. She really knows how to make you draw really good”

⚠️ Favoritism Risk

40/100

“She DOES play favorites. You had to be a good artist and play sweet.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“ .”

🎨 Critique Strength

70/100

“she has a great eye for what to improve on in your work. and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and hard to hear
  • soft spoken in class, but
  • She teaches on her computer which make everything fun and easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard to gauge what you'll get in her class (she loved my work and gave me a b)
  • She DOES play favorites
  • of stress

Theme 3

🎨 About Creative Coaching

  • make you draw really good and make you very creative
  • great eye for what to improve on in your work
  • overall very cool

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2005-2010 with mixed but detailed themes; older sample limits confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART15A2 reviews
ARTD15A2 reviews
2DDESIGN1 review
ART20D1 review
ARTD15DRAW1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values