AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Evangeline Gagalang

NURS3 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle a high-pressure, intimidating clinical instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIntimidating clinical styleEmbarrasses studentsKnowledgeable but harshNot recommendedNo patience
  • Single review says she is knowledgeable yet unsuitable to teach.
  • Student reports eye-rolling, public embarrassment, and intimidation.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and no comments suggest easy grades or light standards.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The only review rates difficulty at the maximum and frames the experience as high pressure.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The sole student and poor teaching fit.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No grade data, but the .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Clinical nursing context with high difficulty rating implies heavy real-world demand.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Student says she is intelligent but not suitable to teach and thrives on intimidation.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One NURS3 review describes high knowledge but harsh bedside manner and intimidation.

Main concern

Public embarrassment and lack of patience with student mistakes.

What students said

“ ! Strives on intimidation!”
NURS3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

clinical teaching review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Strives on intimidation!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting intimidation and teaching fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

15/100

“ ! Strives on intimidation!”

🧠 Knowledgeable but Harsh

28/100

“Very intelligent and knowledgeable but is not suitable to teach.”

😬 Clinical Intimidation

20/100

“Will embarrass you in front of patient. No tack.”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Clinical Teaching

  • No patience. Rolls eyes if you make a mistake.
  • Will embarrass you in front of patient.
  • Strives on intimidation!

Theme 2

📉 About Fit for Teaching

  • Very intelligent and knowledgeable but is not suitable to teach.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older review exists, so confidence in any conclusion remains low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values