AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Susan Spicher

CHLD64 · CHILD10 · CHILDEV10 · CHLD10 · CHILD68 · CHDCHIL · CHILD1 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you have spare time for heavy paperwork and can follow picky submission rules for a fair grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy BusyworkPicky FormatterQuantity Over QualityInconsistent GradingPolarizing Workload
  • Workload is heavy with many papers, observations, and .
  • An A is reachable if you complete everything on time and follow her exact format rules.
  • Students split hard and , and unfair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Many say you can earn an A by finishing all work and meeting format rules, but the volume and pickiness make it real effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is often called easy or mediocre, but tedious papers, observations, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility is unclear from student comments.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Fans praise humor and reachable As; critics call her picky, biased, and overloaded with busywork.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

She often grades on quantity and , but docks heavily for format and late-revealed criteria.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Nearly every detailed , and projects.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some find her humorous and clear; others call her inconsistent, off-topic, or mediocre.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and online homework more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

online homework and detailed projects; grades favor completing volume of work over polish.

Main concern

Busywork volume, withheld grading details, and .

What students said

“she was an easy teacher but the work was ALOT too many observations but if ur gonna take child 10 take her!! u can get an A”
CHILD10
“shes a sweet teacher and is funny sometimes but she is really hard. she gives way too much work”
CHILD10
“Inconsistent! Incomplete! Unreliable. Blames students. !”
CHLD10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and online quizzes are mentioned as hard or misaligned with lectures; .

Online TestsHard TestsNo Study GuidesLecture-Test Mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments; some say tests are hard and lack study guides.

Online TestsHard TestsNo Study Guides
“ the online tests!”
CHILD10
“plus she's doesn't give out study guides, ad the . u have to know EVERYTHING!”
CHILD10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i took child 10 with ms.spicher she was an easy teacher but the work was ALOT too many observations but if ur gonna take child 10 take her!! u can get an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 in-person reviews (2004-2009), highlighting workload, grading pickiness, and polarized recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Heavy Busywork Load

28/100

“she gives way too much work and expects a lot out of her students. much of the work is busy work”

🎯 Reachable A With Effort

60/100

“Just laugh at her jokes, sit in front, turn in hw on time youll get an A”

⚖️

48/100

“ if ”

👍 Split Recommendations

52/100

“I highly reccomend this professor!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is "quirky" at times but still funny
  • She keeps you awake and is very humorous
  • Tends to talk about personal issues more then teaching the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • u can get an A
  • A lot of
  • grade mostly on quantity, not quality

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness & Consistency

  • plays favorites
  • Inconsistent! Incomplete! Unreliable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty in-person reviews span 2004-2009 with polarized but recurring workload and pickiness themes; ages and missing grades limit confidence.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHILD1013 reviews
CHLD102 reviews
CHDCHIL1 review
CHILD11 review
CHILD681 review
Show 2 more courses
CHILDEV101 review
CHLD641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values