AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Denise Bailey

CHEM50 · CHEM10 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong self-starter in chemistry and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough lab graderUnclear expectationsHard testsLow enthusiasmSelf-teach chemistry
  • Most students and .
  • Lectures are often called robotic, book-identical, or non-explanatory.
  • A single positive CHEM10 review conflicts with the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students report , and many smart classmates stuck at B or lower.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Chemistry content plus hard, confusing tests make the course feel intellectually and logistically tough.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews urge students to stay and weak teaching clarity.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Repeated complaints of and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students say , and useful guidance.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades lean on weekly labs and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chemistry sections are widely described as hard, poorly explained, and .

Main concern

, and hard tests make success feel out of reach for many.

What students said

“ ! She is miserable teaching.”
CHEM50
“grades extremely hard on lab reports(which are once a week) by all means stay away”
CHEM50
“I got an A and the class was not that hard. ”
CHEM10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as extremely hard and not aligned with ; lab reports are graded without tolerance.

Hard testsConfusing test problemsWeekly lab reports

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly lab reports graded very harshly, without clear proctoring software mentions.

Hard testsConfusing test problemsWeekly lab reports
“ .”
CHEM50
“Her tests are very hard. She gives the homework she gives).”
CHEM10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . At first she seemed all cool but when it really came down to it she does not care about her students. She is very unclear with what she expects in her class and grades extremely hard on lab reports(which are once a week) by all means stay away”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person , and weak lecture support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .She grades very very hard on the labs and does not tell you what she expects.”

🧪

15/100

“ and .”

📚 Teaching Clarity

24/100

“She doesn't communicate the material. Her class is more of a copy everything written from the board environment.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture notes identical to book and they are like passages more than notes
  • teaches like a robot that goes through the steps and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . She makes it impossible to do well in lab
  • smart people in class but they are all ended up getting a B or lower

Theme 3

❤️ About Care & Support

  • she wants you to fail
  • does not care about her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly consistent negative in-person reviews from 2008-2009 give a .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM506 reviews
CHEM103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values