AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Shawn Doubiago

WS52 · PHIL1 · PHI1 · HUM001 · HUM30A · HUMAN52 · PHIL35 · PHILO25 · HUMAN30B · FEMMPHIL · WS35 · HUMANITIES21 · PHIL2350 · HUM52 · PHILPHIL · PHIL0416 · HUMAN21 · FEMPHIL3O · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
81.25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her for an engaging, low-stress humanities or feminist theory class if and a loose structure.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDiscussion DrivenCaringDisorganizedEasy A PotentialFilm & Feminism
  • Students love her discussion-based feminist philosophy and women-in-cinema classes.
  • if you attend, read, and .
  • Main knock is disorganization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Students repeatedly say solid essays, reading, and .

; no online sample.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is interesting and discussion-friendly, though and theory-heavy.

as PHIL35 and HUM52.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

Many sections list attendance as and .

In-person only; participation is central to the class experience.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and caring style despite disorganization.

Recommendation strength .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students and late-work flexibility.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly readings and a few essays or exams; not crushing if you stay on top of the reader.

Format shift

Some .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Passionate discussion leader who engages students deeply, offset by recurring disorganization.

Format shift

In-person reviews consistently praise discussions more than lecture polish.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

42/100

Papers, responses, participation, midterm, and .

Format shift

and final at about 20% each.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

lively discussions, film analysis, caring vibe, with recurring notes that but fair and easygoing.

Main concern

Disorganization, late posting of readings, and .

What students said

“All you have to do to get an A is attend .”
HUM52
“Professor Doubiago is very nice, but disorganized. The biggest issue I had with this class was her delay in .”
PHIL35
“She definitely cares about her students.”
WS52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and if you read and attend; .

Take-Home Midterm PortionsEasy ExamsEssay BasedParticipation Points

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals that students call fair and sometimes partly take-home.

Take-Home MidtermEssaysEasy Exams
“I'm a few .”
HUM52
“Easy exams. She's very openminded and she tries really hard to help her students.”
PHIL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I LOVED Doubiago's women & cinema class. Her class was what I looked forward to each week, as . All you have to do to get an A is attend class, pay attention, & submit assignments on time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 in-person reviews only, , and disorganization. Credibility rating: High.

💬 Discussion Quality

88/100

“Class conversations were also very fun.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ ”

📁 Organization Gaps

45/100

“Although Professor Doubiago was very .”

🎯 Easy A Potential

80/100

“as long as you are keeping up with your readings and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is great at facilitating conversation
  • She is so sweet, and likes listening to students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Shawn's lenient with late work, and grades easy
  • there's an insane amount of reading

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she definitely cares about her students
  • absolute QUEEN!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

45 in-person reviews over many years show stable themes of , and disorganization.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUM526 reviews
FEMPHIL3O5 reviews
PHIL15 reviews
PHIL355 reviews
HUMAN214 reviews
Show 13 more courses
FEMMPHIL3 reviews
HUMAN523 reviews
WS523 reviews
PHIL23502 reviews
HUM0011 review
HUM30A1 review
HUMAN30B1 review
HUMANITIES 211 review
PHI11 review
PHIL04161 review
PHILO251 review
PHILPHIL1 review
WS351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 6 · A 15

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values