AI Rate Professor

English

Tomas Moniz

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL85C · ENG5 · ENG85C · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you write independently, need no guidance, and have no other English option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo Useful FeedbackSlow or No EmailsTough Unpredictable GraderDisorganized ModulesEssay Heavy
  • Most recent online , and defensive grading.
  • A minority of students like his discussions and personality when the system works.
  • for many sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some strong writers earn As, but tough and , and withdrawals show an A is not low-effort.

Online reviews stress harsh essay grading more than the smaller in-person sample.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Workload is mainly reading and several essays rather than advanced theory, but .

Online organization problems make the same material feel harder than in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while some courses allow only two absences or push peer-review participation.

; a few sections still enforce limits or peer-review sessions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Would-take-again sits near one-third, and .

Older in-person and a few online fans exist, but the dominant online signal is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report mood-based essay scores, zero for low plagiarism matches, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Typical load is several essays plus reading, which is manageable for practiced writers but still significant.

Format shift

Online students more often call homework heavy or .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Passion appears in some reviews, but , and disorganization dominate the recent record.

Format shift

In-person discussion praise is outnumbered by online communication failures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

peer reviews and limited other assessments.

Format shift

Online ENGL1B comments repeatedly say essays drive nearly the whole grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and more mixed, with some students praising discussion energy and while others call him lazy and rude.

Main concern

Communication and responsiveness still surface as .

What students said

“He was good at moderating and encouraging discussions, so the class was mostly just interesting conversation”
ENG85C
“ CLASS. LAZY AND RUDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online English sections draw the : disorganized modules, late or , and harsh or opaque grading that led some students to withdraw.

Main concern

Unclear instructions plus slow communication leave students guessing how to improve.

What students said

“ . The .”
ENGL1B
“ . Never communicate with students.”
ENGL1B
“You just gotta wing it. He grades late and he isn't consistent with the syllabus.”
ENG85C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-centered rather than proctored testing, but and .

Essay BasedPeer ReviewFew Traditional ExamsRubric Clarity Varies

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and readings than formal exam software; exam policy is not clearly detailed.

Discussion BasedReadingsEssays
“the class was mostly just interesting conversation”
ENG85C
“you do a lot of interesting and fun reads in his class”
ENGL85C

Online

Online work is essay and module based; reviews do .

EssaysModulesPeer ReviewNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There are /poetry we read. Those four essays are 80% of the grade”
ENGL1B
“ and if you get maybe 5% he will give you a 0”
ENGL1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ . Emails were never responded to”

👎 Recommendation Level

34/100

“Just dont. For your sanity dont.”

⚖️

24/100

“ and unpredictable preference”

📬 Communication Gaps

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's so disorganized
  • I found him to be incredible and such an engaging lecturer

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Really harsh, horrible schedule and takes off marks easily
  • A if you do the work
  • One missing assignment worth 10 points will drop you a letter grade

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Takes a
  • Never communicate with students
  • During office hours, Moniz was nowhere to be found

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews spanning several years, mostly online and thematically consistent on feedback and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENGL1B9 reviews
ENG1A4 reviews
ENG85C4 reviews
ENG53 reviews
ENGL85C2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 11 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3