AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Micheal Lin

POLISCI1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

; be cautious with compressed online winter sessions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLaid-back in personDebate-friendly lecturesWeekly essays onlineLimited feedbackAttendance flexible when present
  • In-person students like his chill style, civil political debate, and .
  • One intensive online winter section , and unresponsive on late work.
  • Overall experience depends heavily on format and session pace.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is reachable in a regular section with reading and engagement, but a rushed online winter session produced a C with strict late rules.

; sole online winter review earned a C.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

and discussion, but weekly papers in compressed terms raise the load.

In-person feels chill; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

In-person attendance becomes flexible after early weeks if you keep up; .

Evidence of flexibility is mainly in-person; online was mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Two strong in-person endorsements outweigh one do-not-recommend winter online review.

; online winter student would not recommend unless you accept a strict professor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Chill regular sections contrast with strict late enforcement and a C in the compressed online term.

Format shift

In-person reads lenient; online winter reads strict on lateness.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Reading and participation are core; .

Format shift

Online winter is paper-heavy; in-person workload is lighter if you keep modules current.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students praise civil debate facilitation and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is well liked; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and some group work rather than proctored exams.

Format shift

Online winter is essay-centric; in-person mixes debate and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students call him laid back and caring, with civil debates and .

Main concern

Keep him informed and keep up with modules even if .

What students said

“He's a laid back kind of professor and is pretty chill about a lot of things, you just have to keep him in the known.”
POLISCI1
“His class provided a good venue for in class debate, all political views were respected and he kept the conversations civil.”
POLISCI1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One winter online section featured weekly essays with only three , and strict late policy.

Main concern

, and ignored late-work emails.

What students said

“There was an , and he would only give three days to work on it. .”
POLISCI1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe papers and .

Weekly essaysModule readingIn-class debateGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment emphasizes debate participation and .

In-class debateModule readingGroup projects
“His class provided a good venue for in class debate, all political views were respected.”
POLISCI1

Online

Only and no stated proctoring tools.

Weekly essaysShort turnaroundNo assignment feedback
“There was an , and he would only give three days to work on it. .”
POLISCI1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a laid back kind of professor and is pretty chill about a lot of things, you just have to keep him in the known.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in-person), stressing format differences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“His class provided a good venue for in class debate, all political views were respected and he kept the conversations civil when things seemed to get tense.”

📅 Format Split

40/100

“There was an , and he would only give three days to work on it. .”

🚪

62/100

“I hardly attended the class but at first make sure you go for at least the first month and from there he didn't really care about attends as long as .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a laid back kind of professor and is pretty chill about a lot of things.
  • all political views were respected and he kept the conversations civil.
  • Do not reccomend unles ur ok with strict profs.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • There was an , and he would only give three days to work on it.
  • .
  • as long as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across years and formats; vivid but too few for high confidence, especially with one extreme winter session.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLISCI13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values