AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Becky Gee

Courses not reported · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and stay on top of labs; skip if you need leniency or a curve.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyTough graderNo curvePractice examsPolarizing
  • safety net.
  • and practice exams; older reviews call her unapproachable.
  • Labs and ; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As are possible but require strong exam performance plus steady labs and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Chemistry content and exam pace are hard for many students .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and labs, with little leniency for absences.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; praise for lectures conflicts with and grading.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and picky labs and late-work rules.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Chapter problem sets, labs, and overload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call lectures fantastic and supportive; others find her unhelpful, unapproachable, and unforgiving.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Course is repeatedly described as and homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and mandatory labs; experience splits between helpful lectures and harsh, unforgiving grading.

Main concern

and costly.

What students said

“DO NOT take this professor for Chemistry. Her class was very, very exam heavy and if you did not do well in .”
40044
“Professor Gee was fantastic. You can tell she really wants all her students to understand the material.”
40044
“she provided us with a exam in terms of difficulty and formats.”
40044

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; practice exams help but formats can still feel hard and unforgiving.

Practice examsOne paper note sheetFill-in-blank examsHigh exam weight

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, limited notes, and little recovery after a bad score.

Practice examsOne paper note sheetFill-in-blank examsNo curve
“Besides the the actual exams but it's hard to come back from a bad test in this class. 1 paper note sheet allowed.”
40044
“The if . 8-questions each question worth 20 points, for a total of 160.”
40044
“ .”
40044

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT take this professor for Chemistry. Her class was very, very exam heavy and if you did not do well in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person , and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

78/100

“Her class was very, very exam heavy and if you did not do well in .”

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“Professor Gee was fantastic. You can tell she really wants all her students to understand the material.”

⚖️

28/100

“No /curve/bump.”

📚

60/100

“she provided us with a exam in terms of difficulty and formats.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and you don't need to rely solely on the textbook.
  • I guess her teaching improved.
  • she

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No /curve/bump
  • Unless chem is your thing, this class will drain your soul.

Theme 3

🧪

  • She didn't nitpick the lab reports as other people say; in fact, they were pretty casual.
  • Labs picky
  • There are problems set (around 14 questions) for each chapter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews span 2023-2025 with , but the sample is small and opinions are polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

400447 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1