AI Rate Professor

Multimedia

Matthew Silverberg

MMART134 · 134AMART · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are ready to teach yourself the software entirely from YouTube.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachOutdated VideosSelf Teach on YouTubeRude DeliveryPlays Favorites
  • Most recent students say he skips real instruction and .
  • Classroom tone is often described as rude, rushed, or favoritist.
  • Older reviews are kinder, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Some older students say effort yields an A, but learning is self-driven and instruction quality is poor.

Grade ease comments are mostly older in-person; online sample is one vague review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Software , but missing fundamentals and rushed demos make it harder than it should be.

Difficulty mainly described in in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most detailed reviews mark attendance mandatory even when students say little teaching happens in class.

In-person evidence is clearer; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and repeated calls to learn elsewhere or drop.

Both formats lean negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades can still land high for effort, but .

Format shift

Older in-person students mention As more than recent critics.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Lots of homework and self-driven project work without strong in-class teaching support.

Format shift

Workload tags appear mainly in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is that he does not teach fundamentals and ships students to outdated videos.

Format shift

In-person reviews are detailed and damning; one online .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Projects, tutorials, and ; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

and tutorial complaints drive this read.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MMART/134 feedback is largely negative: rushed tutorials, no basics, outdated Zoom videos, and rude remarks.

Main concern

Paying for a class that forces self-teaching from old videos.

What students said

“Why am I paying a teacher when I'm going to using YouTube tutorials? Avoid!”
MMART134
“he refuses to cover basics of complicated software even though it is an introductory class.”
134AMART

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review only .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ ”
MMART134

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tutorials rather than formal exams.

Online

online review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Why am I paying a teacher when I'm going to using YouTube tutorials? Avoid!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, emphasizing recent in-person complaints about non-teaching and outdated videos. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Failure

15/100

“He does not teach instead speeds through the tutorial and didn't let me ask questions.”

📺 Outdated Materials

20/100

“Went to the videos and they are outdated unlabeled from 2020.”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not teach
  • I didn't learn anything from him

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Show him effort and he will give you an 'A'.
  • refuses to cover basics of complicated software

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he is disrespectful
  • plays favorites
  • Sometimes he can be a little bit rushed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews over many years show a consistent recent negative teaching pattern, though older praise and sparse grade detail limit certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MMART1344 reviews
134AMART3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1