AI Rate Professor

English

Sonya Wozniak

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL5 · ENG5 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · 149 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
43.86%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong independent writer ready for and messy organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderDisorganized CanvasSo many papersPolarizing feedbackLate grading
  • and flexible, many call her unfair and disorganized.
  • and slow feedback.
  • Canvas chaos and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many students say even strong effort yields B/C and that disagreement with her views tanks grades.

Online reviews more often call an A unrealistic; but some As with heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and high critical-thinking expectations make the content demanding.

Both formats stress reading and essays; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, though a minority of sections require it.

Online is usually optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; praise for care clashes with avoid-at-all-costs warnings about fairness and organization.

; and scathing reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students report points off for style, opinion mismatch, and .

Format shift

; online also cites missing feedback.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

So , and multi-essay workloads dominate student comments.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy essay loads; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

some find her caring and inspiring, many find her rude, unresponsive, and disorganized.

Format shift

; online skews more negative on support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades rest mainly on multiple essays and , and final.

Format shift

Essay-heavy in both formats; and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person is still mixed but includes more praise for compassion and .

Main concern

Unreasonable expectations, unclear instructions, and .

What students said

“ unless . Her instructions for essays were all over the place and very difficult to follow.”
ENGL1B
“I felt challenged, but not overwhelmed, and I always found the professor easy to talk to when I had questions or needed support.”
ENGLISH1A
“She's the worst teacher I've ever had. course”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and frequent avoid warnings.

Main concern

, and harsh essay grades with .

What students said

“Extremely tough grader. I had multiple meetings with her outside of class for . ; required a lot of reaching out for .”
ENG5
“Wozniak gives few details and penalizes you for following them. If you disagree with her opinion you're toast.”
ENG1A
“The and outdated. Gives 0 feedback on the 3 essays given.”
ENG5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers; limited comments mention midterms, finals, and .

Essay-heavyOccasional midterm and finalReading quizzesFew proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One detailed review notes four essays, a midterm and final each worth 50, plus quizzes; .

Four essaysMidterm and finalReading quizzesExtra credit
“There are four essays, each worth 200 points. A midterm and a final each worth 50 points. Class discussions, writing workshops, and a few reading quizzes worth a total of 100 points.”
ENGL1B

Online

Online reviews focus on essays and Canvas chaos and do not clearly prove webcam or lockdown proctoring.

Multiple essaysLate feedbackDisorganized Canvas
“Never received any feedback on my essays, despite them making up the majority of the grade”
ENG1B
“Gives 0 feedback on the 3 essays given.”
ENG5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless she is your last resort like she was for me, go with someone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing harsh majority themes with a . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ . Rude attitude, uninvolved in the course, no support”

⚖️

22/100

“Sonya grades extremely unfairly, if she doesn't agree with .”

📁 Organization Pain

30/100

“There are so . Her due dates are all out of line”

❤️ Polarizing Care

70/100

“Really caring and funny in person, very flexible and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • disorganized teacher
  • Amazing lectures (for some)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • Unless you are a genius you will never receive an A

Theme 3

💔 About Support & Fairness

  • no genuine constructive opinions
  • She never give feed back
  • I had to fight for my grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

149

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years with rich detail and recurring themes of and organization issues.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 519
3 out of 515
2 out of 535
1 out of 541

Course coverage

ENG1A23 reviews
ENG1B12 reviews
ENG57 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
ENGL53 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

16

B+ 1 · B 15

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1