AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yevgeniy Russakovskii

MATH1A · MATH3 · MATH203 · CALC3C · CALCSCAL2 · MATH105 · MATH3B · MATHB · MATH3C · MATH201 · CALC2 · MATH2295 · MATH3A · CALC3B · MATHCALC · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless and , because lectures often fail to clarify the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProThick accent barrierConfusing analogiesHard examsSelf-teach requiredHomework heavy
  • Many students say lectures are due to accent and .
  • and motivated self-learners.
  • Older reviews are harshly negative; a if you show initiative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn As and exam prep, but and grades hard-won.

In-person opinions split; the one online review describes a fair path to A with homework.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calculus and related classes are often called hard, with difficult tests and incomplete lecture support.

Difficulty complaints are almost all in person; online reports moderate difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

and prep, though some say lectures add little.

Mostly in-person evidence with mixed mandatory reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

A minority praise him when students invest effort, but and self-teach.

Online review is positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Several students report and .

Format shift

; online is more supportive.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

and time-consuming, often several hours weekly, even when used as .

Format shift

; in-person emphasizes volume more.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Common themes are unintelligible , and .

Format shift

; one online review is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and quizzes dominate grades, with .

Format shift

; online notes homework plus exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized but lean negative on teaching clarity, with frequent accent and .

Main concern

Lectures often and .

What students said

“ . .”
41873
“He is not good at explaining due to his useless analogies .”
CALC3B
“Easy to get an A if you learn what's on the .”
MATH3A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One positive online review praises patience, feedback, and .

Main concern

Only one online review, so it may not represent the broader experience.

What students said

“He went out of his way to make the material easier to follow and patiently showed the steps to solve the problems.”
MATH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as difficult and high-stakes, with limited helpful review for many students.

Hard examsFew long questionsStudy guides sometimes matchHomework-based practiceHarsh grading reported

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and harshly graded, though some say study guides match tests.

Hard exams6-11 problemsHarsh gradingReview sometimes matches test
“ and he does very little to help to prepare for it.”
MATH3B
“Easy to get an A if you learn what's on the . few take home testes thats 60% of your grade.”
MATH3A
“He gives a review before each test & 90% of the review is on the test.”
MATH203

Online

Online student says practice tests are very similar to exams and .

Practice tests similar to examsHomework-heavy prep
“ ; they .”
MATH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Hands down worst teacher. Not only does he have a thick accent which is hard to understand, he mixes "metaphorsanalogies" in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, , and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

34/100

“He is not good at explaining due to his useless analogies .”

📚

32/100

“ myself out of the book.”

📈 Grade Path

52/100

“if and you will have to spend 3 hours a week), you will get an A.”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • thick accent which is hard to understand
  • Lectures are from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to get an A if you learn what's on the

Theme 3

❤️ Positive Outliers

  • He was enthusiastic and cared about students
  • study guides he gives out are exactly like the tests
  • EUGENE ROCKS!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews over many years give a strong sample, with a clear majority criticizing teaching clarity despite some positive outliers.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH3B9 reviews
CALC3B4 reviews
MATH3A3 reviews
CALC22 reviews
MATH1A2 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH2012 reviews
MATH32 reviews
418731 review
CALC3C1 review
CALCSCAL21 review
MATH1051 review
MATH2031 review
MATH22951 review
MATH3C1 review
MATHB1 review
MATHCALC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values