AI Rate Professor

English

Chris Lebo Planas

ENG264 · ENGL1A · ENG85A · ENGL5 · ENG201 · ENGLISH85A · ENG101A · 204A · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a flexible English grade and can self-manage a messy schedule; skip if you need tight structure.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A with rewritesCaring but unorganizedFlexible deadlinesGroup projects heavyBoring lectures
  • Easy grades via rewrites, lenient deadlines, and light failure risk
  • Nice and and slow to grade
  • In-person better than online; online tech and schedule issues stand out

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Rewrites, lenient deadlines, and many A grades make an A reachable with modest effort for most students.

Both formats report easy A; online adds that you may learn little while still passing.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is generally light English work, though one lit section felt slow and boring rather than conceptually hard.

In-person reviews dominate; online mainly complains about clarity, not conceptual depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and others mandatory, with mixed enforcement across reviews.

Online reviews lean optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

; fans praise care and ease while critics reject disorganization and weak teaching.

; recent and online comments are more mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students cite rewrites, partial late credit, flexible deadlines, and near-impossible fail rates.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats; online still grades but with .

Workload

Light

68/100

Usually a few papers, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

and groups dominate; online workload clarity is the bigger issue.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Kind and accessible but , and in lecture.

Format shift

In-person praises accessibility; online stresses lack of prep for remote teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and group presentations more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Evidence is mainly in-person papers and projects; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In person he is seen as , and often an easy A with papers and group work, but lectures feel unplanned and dry.

Main concern

, and boring pace frustrate students who want clear structure.

What students said

“pretty much impossible to fail.”
ENGL1A
“Yes, you'll get an easy A, but the pace is very slow, making the class dry and boring.”
ENGL5

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students call him unprepared and not tech-savvy, with and weak materials; still possible easy A if you tolerate chaos.

Main concern

and low-quality online materials force students to chase him.

What students said

“ and definitely not tech-savvy.”
ENGL5
“Easy A? Yes if you tolerate his awful course material.”
ENGL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and projects with rewrites, so .

Essay and paper focusedRewrites allowedGroup debates or presentationsLimited high-stakes exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group debates with rewrites rather than strict closed-book finals.

Papers and rewritesGroup debatesFlexible deadlines
“he allows rewrites for essay”
ENGL5
“We were only given 4 papers to write (including the midterm).”
ENGL5

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or ; and weak materials.

Unclear due datesLow-quality online materials
“he doesn't make due dates and .”
ENGL5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes, you'll get an easy A, but the pace is very slow, making the class dry and boring. and communicate with.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (2 online, 18 in person), highlighting ease, care, and disorganization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“the class lacked organization - his lectures seemed like he was planning them right then and there.”

🅰️ Easy A Reality

82/100

“pretty much impossible to fail.”

❤️ Character and Care

80/100

“ and gives you the .”

📉 Online Weak Spot

30/100

“Not prepared at all to teach an online class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and occasional contradictions
  • talks to himself the whole class
  • Nice guy but not the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • pretty much impossible to fail
  • Easy A? Yes if you tolerate his awful course material.
  • allows rewrites for essay

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • always happy to bounce ideas off of
  • Super caring
  • very accommodating with deadlines

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews span 2009-2025 with consistent themes on ease, care, and disorganization across many courses.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL510 reviews
204A4 reviews
ENG101A1 review
ENG2011 review
ENG2641 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG85A1 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH85A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1