AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Dylan Eret

HIM05 · HUMANITIES40 · HUMAN5 · PHIL1 · HUMANITIES30B · HUMAN1 · HUM40 · HUAMN15 · HUM1 · HUM15 · HUMAN15 · HIS19 · HUMAN40 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
60.61%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him only if and and uneven feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGet Ready To ReadPolarizingExtra CreditUnclear FeedbackLecture Heavy
  • Reviews split hard between passionate mentor and .
  • Expect , and work for credit that can feel uneven.
  • Online sections draw more complaints about self-teaching and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn As with , but and heavy work keep the A from feeling free.

Online reviews stress huge weekly workload; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is humanities-level with and .

Both formats report reading load; online comments emphasize self-paced video and article volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

on section and semester.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 60% would take again, with love for passion and clarity.

In-person fans are warmer; online reviews more often warn others away.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and rarely full credit appear often even when students follow the rubric.

Format shift

Online and in-person both include harsh-grader complaints, with .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, writing, projects, and weekly work dominate both formats.

Format shift

Online students especially call the credit-to-work ratio poor.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Quality scores polarize between amazing lectures and .

Format shift

In person earns more passion praise; online more often feels hands-off.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and reading work more than classic exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he can be inspiring with field trips and lively discussion, but clarity and .

Main concern

and harsh point deductions frustrate a large minority.

What students said

“Professor Eret is fantastic. With a creative, flexible and challenging (in a good way) curriculum”
HUM40
“This professor is an . You can go above and beyond and he still would ”
HUMAN1
“So many opportunities, no way you can fail if you actually try in the class.”
HUM1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections , and picky weekly grading.

Main concern

Many online students say he barely teaches and .

What students said

“A TON of reading and writing each week because he doesn't actually teach.”
HUMAN5
“Easy to get an A if you do the work, but there is SO MUCH WORK.”
HUMAN40
“ but it seems he's more welcoming in a face to face setting.”
HUM40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and and midterms.

Open Book FinalProjectsQuizzesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-book finals, game quizzes, midterms, and .

Open book finalQuizzes as gamesMidterm and final
“There is one project where you have to attend an event, and .”
HUM1
“He loves to play game for the .”
HUMAN15

Online

Online comments mention finals, performance projects, and .

Final projectExamWeekly homework
“Just beware of the final live performance project + .”
HUMAN1
“You have 2 Exams and a 10-12 page paper, and A LOT of xtra credit opportunities.”
HUMAN40

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy to get an A if you do the work, but there is SO MUCH WORK.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“A TON of reading and writing each week because he doesn't actually teach.”

⚖️

38/100

“He never gives full credit on all assignments even when you fulfill the .”

🔥 Passion Upside

80/100

“Dr. Eret is the . Please .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he rambes wayy too much in his lectures
  • enjoyable lectures that you want to go to
  • , and what he does is ramble.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to get an A if you do the work, but there is SO MUCH WORK.
  • He is a and
  • So many opportunities, no way you can fail if you actually try

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • Just hours of youtube videos and articles
  • more welcoming in a face to face setting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats show a stable polarized pattern with rich detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 513
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HUM118 reviews
HUM408 reviews
HUMAN15 reviews
HUMAN405 reviews
HUMAN55 reviews
Show 8 more courses
HUMAN152 reviews
HIM051 review
HIS191 review
HUAMN151 review
HUM151 review
HUMANITIES30B1 review
HUMANITIES401 review
PHIL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 5 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1