AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Gustavo Espinoza

CHEM12B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are ready to self-teach organic .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teach requiredNo class structureTough closed-book examsDoesn't care about teachingLots of homework
  • Students say he openly does not care about teaching and is poorly prepared
  • Course lacks structure, schedule, and enough lecture coverage for
  • unfair

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even the A , and heavy self-teaching to keep a grade.

All evidence is from two in-person CHEM12B reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty ratings are maxed out and students say content exceeds lecture coverage.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and another says it was not, so .

In-person only; conflicting attendance reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students call him the and describe disengagement, chaos, and unfair exams.

Zero positive recommendations in the in-person sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tagged as a and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework and because .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students report he says he does not care about teaching, copies a syllabus, and leaves the class unstructured.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and structure, plus lots of homework and reading.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both in-person CHEM12B reviews describe disengaged , and a .

Main concern

low averages and little guidance.

What students said

“ . He spent a good amount of time telling us how little he cared about teaching”
CHEM12B
“Tests on more content than he can .”
CHEM12B
“Closed-book exams.”
CHEM12B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are closed-book, tough, and cover more material .

Closed-book examsTough examsLow averagesSelf-teach required

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and low averages with little lecture coverage.

Closed-book examsTough examsLow averages
“Closed-book exams.”
CHEM12B
“ and low averages.”
CHEM12B
“Tests on more content than he can .”
CHEM12B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He spent a good amount of time telling us how little he cared about teaching and how he had another job in computational chemistry lined up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ . He spent a good amount of time telling us how little he cared about teaching”

📚

15/100

“Tests on more content than he can .”

📉

18/100

“Closed-book exams.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“Absolutely horrible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He spent a good amount of time telling us how little he cared about teaching
  • He copy & pasted a syllabus and didn't give us a class schedule
  • Usually late.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • and low averages.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

  • Lack of class structure
  • We did 3 lab experiments total.
  • didn't give us a class schedule (tests, etc.) until over a month into the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are detailed and strongly consistent in the negative direction.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM12B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values