AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Sarah Van Wart

CSCI185 · MMART162 · MMART164 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a and can handle an intense, attendance-required class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringAmazing lecturesInspirationalAccessible outside classAccommodating
  • All three reviews are 5/5 and .
  • Engaging, passionate teaching makes CS and web design feel alive.
  • Intense courses with but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Students report A and A+ with accommodating options, but intensity and .

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-to-high and one review calls the class very intense despite supportive teaching.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and a tag says skip class and you will not pass.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

100% would take again and .

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and softer alternate options help students succeed.

Format shift

In person only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Assignments are thoughtful and relevant but the course is described as very intense.

Format shift

In person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students call her engaging, charming, passionate, and one of their all-time favorites.

Format shift

In person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades revolve around scaled assignments, ebooks of student work, and .

Format shift

In person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe her as smart, engaging, and accommodating, with relevant assignments and strong community.

Main concern

Class can be VERY INTENSE with .

What students said

“I wish she could teach every CS course.”
CSCI185
“Sarah is one of .”
MMART164
“Class is VERY INTENSE!”
MMART162

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and accommodation rather than formal proctored exams.

Scaled assignmentsAlternate assignmentsPrompt grading

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment ; exam logistics are not described.

Scaled assignmentsAlternate assignmentsPrompt feedback
“ ”
MMART164
“Provided !”
MMART162

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wish she could teach every CS course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 In person reviews, highlighting engagement and intensity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Dr. Van Wart is smart, capable, engaging, and charming.”

❤️ Caring Mentorship

95/100

“Sarah is one of .”

📚 Intensity With Support

70/100

“Class is VERY INTENSE!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • taught with a zest and passion that kept me fully engaged
  • Makes programming survivable to learn
  • Really encourages a community within the class.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • really a cool person
  • Was incredibly accommodating with assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed 5/5 in-person reviews from 2016-2023 with highly consistent praise but limited sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSCI1851 review
MMART1621 review
MMART1641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1