AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Dwayne Byndloss

COUNSELING57 · COUN57 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage; grading and organization are widely criticized.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear GradingParticipation MattersSkip Class FailsLecture Heavy
  • Two of three students call the class disorganized with .
  • High grades (A-/A+) still appear despite low quality scores and vague instructions.
  • One positive review credits extra review sessions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students still report A- and A+ even while and arbitrary.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings stay low and content is framed as passable if you participate and .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and tags warn skip class and you will not pass.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two of and call the class the .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades can land high, but criteria feel arbitrary and .

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Workload

Light

68/100

Graded by few things with note-taking and participation as .

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Majority describe disorganization, bad guest speakers, and ; one student praises lectures.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Emphasis on participation, note-taking, and few graded items .

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online COUN57 feels disorganized: , and tests based on restating slides, with one outlier praising extra review sessions.

Main concern

and disorganized delivery make outcomes unpredictable.

What students said

“By far the .”
COUN57
“he does not give proper instructions for anything, he gives you whatever grade he wants”
COUN57
“He makes sure students understand the topics and provides extra classes to go over notes for the midterm and final.”
COUNSELING57

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterm and final exist with extra review sessions, but one student says .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online students mention midterm and ; one review says tests require screenshot restating of exact sentences.

Midterm and FinalNote-based gradingScreenshot restating
“provides extra classes to go over notes for the midterm and final”
COUNSELING57
“the ' his screen and restate exact sentences, not concepts”
COUN57

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 Online reviews, highlighting organization and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Mr. Byndloss seemed like he was using someone else's coursework without bothering to review it beforehand.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

🎯 Easy Grades

78/100

“Youll pass if you participate fully, and do work on time.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Organization

  • Would randomly reschedule class
  • does not give proper instructions for anything

Theme 2

📝

  • he gives you whatever grade he wants
  • Youre graded on note taking!
  • his screen

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three Online reviews from 2020-2021 with mixed tone and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COUN572 reviews
COUNSELING571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values