AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Joanne Taylor

HUMANITIES53 · 31A · HUM30A · HUM21 · HUMAN1 · HUMANITIES30A · HUMANITIES21 · HUMAN30A · 30A · HUMAN21 · HUMANITY30A · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take if and film discussion and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPop QuizzesHeavy ReadingSelf AbsorbedLecture Heavy
  • Many students call her a .
  • Film-oriented classes get warmer reviews; ethics and theory courses draw more criticism.
  • , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many C- and ; film classes can be easier if you attend and write carefully.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and theory-level expectations make content hard for many students.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warn that skipping leads to failure via pop quizzes.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and many urge finding any other instructor.

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; students report unequal grades for same answers and earned-not-given marks.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

some love film lectures and humor, many call her belittling, self-absorbed, and unclear.

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of papers, pop quizzes, participation, and film shot-analysis work .

Format shift

All evidence is from In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and polarizing grading with frequent complaints about attitude and office hours.

Main concern

and missed office hours.

What students said

“ unless and knowledge of the material.”
30A
“I loved this class. Most of !”
HUM21
“does not show up to office hours even with appointments.”
HUM30A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes without notice and and assessment risk.

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person sections feature surprise pop quizzes tied .

Pop quizzesHeavy readingShot analysis papersMandatory attendance
“Beware of pop quizzes”
30A
“You must watch the films, and go to class for ”
HUM21
“expect pop quizes without any notice, so you better read”
HUMANITIES30A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 In , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“besides being a . she misses office hours with appointment.”

📚 Heavy Workload

25/100

“ and excepts a .”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • belittles you if you ask questions
  • She just stands infront and luctures away
  • Joanne is hilarious, and really knows her stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of reading
  • grades hard and !

Theme 3

⏰ About Accessibility

  • misses office hours with short notice
  • Skips
  • does not show up to office hours even with appointments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one In person reviews over and heavy-reading patterns with enough detail for high confidence.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HUM30A8 reviews
HUM217 reviews
30A4 reviews
HUMAN213 reviews
HUMAN12 reviews
Show 6 more courses
HUMANITIES30A2 reviews
31A1 review
HUMAN30A1 review
HUMANITIES211 review
HUMANITIES531 review
HUMANITY30A1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

8

C 2 · C- 6

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1