AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mei Tsai

MATH · MAT16A · MATH203 · MATH253 · MATHMATH · MATH142 · ALGEB201 · MATH1 · MATH211 · MATH16A · MATH201A · MATH201 · PRECALC · MATH13 · MATH50 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandTough GraderTests Unrelated to LecturesLanguage BarrierNo Partial Credit
  • Most students say English communication makes lectures .
  • and and no partial credit.
  • Take-again interest is very low despite a few A .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students earn As , but tough grading, no , and no partial credit make an A costly.

; the one online review gives no grade path detail.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is treated as fast and abstract, with high reported difficulty especially in calc and precalc.

; the online hybrid review also rates difficulty as extreme.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Only about 10% would take again, and most comments .

Both formats advise against her; online is a single very negative hybrid review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and little .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure keep the load high.

Format shift

Workload tags appear in both formats, mostly in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Clarity, listening, and .

Format shift

In-person majority and one online review both stress communication problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades hinge on hard multiple-choice tests more than homework effort or partial credit.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math reviews are , and exam alignment with taught material.

Main concern

Language and low take-again rates.

What students said

“Mei Tsai is absolutely the .”
MATH16A
“ class and homework.”
MATH1
“Her English is dramatically bad. .”
MAT16A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single hybrid trig review calls her nearly impossible to understand with little lecture help.

Main concern

Communication barrier makes online or hybrid math nearly unusable.

What students said

“It is IMPOSSIBLE to understand what she says, and she offers little help during her lectures.”
MATH50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and feel disconnected from lectures and homework.

Multiple Choice No Partial CreditTests Differ From LecturesNo Calculators SometimesNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as multiple choice, no partial credit, and misaligned with class material.

Multiple ChoiceNo Partial CreditMaterial Not CoveredNo Calculators
“ and you will receive no partial credit for solving the problem”
MATH1
“ .”
MATH16A
“the ”
MATH16A

Online

Single online hybrid review does not detail exam proctoring or format beyond overall toughness.

Tough Grader
“I took a hybrid trigonometry class using MyMath Lab through Pearson.”
MATH50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mei Tsai is absolutely the . The majority of students taking her class have dropped or are failing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

12/100

“ . She's the most difficult professor ever.”

🗣️ Communication Barrier

20/100

“Ms. Mei doesn't have a good grasp of the english language.”

📝

28/100

“ class and homework.”

⚖️

22/100

“No work to make up your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • It is IMPOSSIBLE to understand what she says
  • she cannot grasp the English language
  • I had to re- her lectures at home

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you are a math wiz, you'll be lucky to get a C

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Help

  • She said " I don't care"
  • Not willing to help student instead ask to look up in the textbook
  • Unsuportlive and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

37 reviews spanning many years show , and .

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 510
1 out of 518

Course coverage

MATH19 reviews
MATH16A6 reviews
MATH2015 reviews
MATH2033 reviews
MATH502 reviews
Show 12 more courses
220721 review
2531 review
ALGEB2011 review
MAT16A1 review
MATH1 review
MATH131 review
MATH1421 review
MATH201A1 review
MATH2111 review
MATH2531 review
MATHMATH1 review
PRECALC1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2