AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Michelle Mueller

HUM1 · HUMAN40 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy grade and can tolerate disorganization and heavy politics.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedPolitical lecturesGroup-project heavyGraded by few thingsPolarizing
  • Two recent reviews call her awful and disorganized while one older review is strongly positive
  • Grades appear easy (A/A-) despite chaos and sparse graded work

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students still report A and A- even while calling the course unstructured and graded on few items.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low and comments describe light academic challenge, not dense content.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One class lists attendance as mandatory, another as optional, so policy is inconsistent.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most recent voices strongly warn against taking her and zero students say .

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Few graded items and high reported grades .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

; others mainly mention group work rather than heavy individual load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is disorganization, cancelled classes, and lectures derailed by politics.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Tags and comments emphasize group projects and a small number of graded things over exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

two students report chaos and political and practical intelligence.

Main concern

Disorganization, cancelled classes, and politicized classroom climate.

What students said

“Awful! . Hard to tell what the grade was based on.”
HUMAN40
“ ! ”
HUM1
“Professor Mueller is an excellent Professor - intelligent, practical.”
HUMAN40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; and group work.

Few graded itemsGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Comments focus on unclear grade basis and .

Graded by few thingsGroup projects
“Hard to tell what the grade was based on.”
HUMAN40
“The .”
HUM1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization, politics, and easy grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She is just terrible. Just terrible. She lacks any structure.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ ! ”

⚖️ Easy Grades Despite Chaos

78/100

“Hard to tell what the grade was based on.”

🗣️ Polarizing Classroom Climate

30/100

“She is far to left that she told the class if anyone of us voted for Trump we're no longer welcome to be in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She lacks any structure.
  • She talks too much about politics that for no reason she changes the subject on the fly!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • The .
  • You have to earn your grade, so do not fall behind on the assignments.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Seems more like a grad student than a PHD.
  • you can voice your opinions and she will accept them.
  • Liberal to the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2016-2018 with conflicting tones; detail is strong but sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HUMAN402 reviews
HUM11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values