AI Rate Professor

Media Communications

Feruz Ahmed

COM5 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVague RubricLots of HomeworkSlow GradingToo Many PapersNot Recommended
  • .
  • Heavy paper and .
  • Students would not take her again despite friendliness outside class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Heavy papers and and a reported C make an A a real struggle.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty is , and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because of vague rubrics, heavy work, and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Tags and comments stress lots of , and many papers.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Friendly outside class but vague rubrics and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course centers on homework and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person COM5 feels overloaded with papers and , and slow grading that leaves students guessing about their standing.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“The rubric given at the beginning of the course is completely vague in .”
COM5
“she so very often she doesn't know exactly herself.”
COM5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The rubric given at the beginning of the course is completely vague in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, , and . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Heavy Workload

18/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK, SO MANY PAPERS”

⚠️

28/100

“The rubric given at the beginning of the course is completely vague in .”

🐢

32/100

“she so very often she doesn't know exactly herself.”

Theme 1

📝

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • Get ready to read

Theme 2

😕

  • The rubric given at the beginning of the course is completely vague in .
  • she so very often she doesn't know exactly herself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old in-person review from 2017 with limited grade and consistency data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COM51 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values