AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jose Martin

PHILO101 · PHIL1 · PHIL2093 · HUM40 · PHIL10 · PHIL16 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want deep philosophy discussion and can handle tough, subjective grading; skip if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyEssay TestsPolarizingReading Heavy
  • some call him wise and transformative, others call him narcissistic and unclear.
  • as strict with little room for mistakes or retakes.
  • Heavy reading plus essay-style tests reward prepared thinkers more than casual students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Several reviews say simple mistakes tank grades and an A is unlikely without deep mastery and careful work.

Online evidence is more negative on grade access; in-person reviews are mixed but still effort-heavy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content ranges from manageable with reading to abstract and advanced for first-time philosophy students.

Online review stresses difficulty; if prepared.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

; in-person notes many students skipped class with limited clear policy detail.

; in-person comments rarely define a strict policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

Admirers recommend him for depth and wisdom, while and .

; in-person opinions split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call him a and .

Format shift

Online review is harshest; in-person also reports GPA hits and strict standards.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Reading and a than daily busywork.

Format shift

reading plus major assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some praise deep knowledge and help; others say he talks in riddles, seems narcissistic, or leaves beginners lost.

Format shift

Online is strongly negative; in-person is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Essay tests, major papers, and .

Format shift

In-person comments detail essay tests and term papers; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

admirers praise wisdom and life-changing depth, critics cite nebulous lectures, ego, and GPA risk.

Main concern

Lectures can feel abstract and conversations skew toward advanced students.

What students said

“His lectures are forty-page Word documents, , and extremely nebulous.”
PHIL16
“ so much human experienced and learned spiritiaul”
PHIL2093
“An easy class if you stay prepared for the .”
PHIL16

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is strongly negative: , and no path to an A even with hard study.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I don't care how hard you study, he will not give you an A.”
PHIL16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essay-style tests and memorization.

Essay TestsMajor PapersNo RetakesReading Required

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and term papers; format details beyond that are limited.

Essay TestsTerm PaperThree Major Assignments
“There are two big essay tests with 20 questions each and 1 term paper due”
PHIL1
“Essay tests so you have to actually learn the stuff.”
HUM40

Online

Online and no path to an easy A.

No RetakesTough GradingLecture Heavy
“He will give you a bad grade for the simplest mistakes and there are .”
PHIL16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't care how hard you study, he will not give you an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (1 online, 9 in person), highlighting polarization in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

45/100

“He talks in riddles so even if you ask him to clarify what he means, you still won't understand.”

🔀 Polarizing Experience

38/100

“ so much human experienced and learned spiritiaul”

⚖️

28/100

“He will give you a bad grade for the simplest mistakes and there are .”

📚 Assessment Style

68/100

“There are two big essay tests with 20 questions each and 1 term paper due”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough and wise Professor.
  • He talks in riddles
  • His lectures are forty-page Word documents,

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I don't care how hard you study, he will not give you an A.
  • An easy class if you stay prepared for the
  • The class I took for fun ended up hurting my GPA.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • the professor is narcissistic
  • He's supposed to teach ME about compassion. WHAT A JOKE!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews give decent volume and , but most are older and opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHIL103 reviews
PHIL163 reviews
HUM401 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL20931 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values