AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kelvin Jew

MATH202 · STATS13 · STATS4261 · MATH250 · STAT · MATH13 · STAT1 · STAT13 · MATH50 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already master the material and only need a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest-Only GradingNo Partial CreditSelf-Teach RequiredBoring LecturesExtra Credit Heavy
  • Majority of reviews rate teaching quality at 1-2 with .
  • Grades and little homework.
  • Heavy and optional attendance can rescue grades only if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Massive can save a grade, but no partial credit and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content difficulty varies, but poor teaching and than the material alone.

All 26 reviews are in-person math and stats courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

and you can pass by studying the book alone.

and mostly describe no formal check.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students urge others to drop or switch instructors despite a .

Recommendation tone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

No partial credit and is available.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Little or ; almost all weight sits on a .

Format shift

and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common complaints , and almost no real teaching.

Format shift

A minority of positive reviews exist, but the majority rate teaching as poor or awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Grades depend almost entirely on tests with little credit for .

Format shift

Consistent across all in-person math and stats sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats lectures are often called boring, robot-like, or unhelpful; and tests.

Main concern

, and weak classroom teaching leave many students failing or dropping.

What students said

“There was no teaching done in this class. . If you are in trig with .”
MATH50
“He was honestly the . He was inconsistent, didn't teach, as grades.”
MATH202
“This Professor is not 'Easy' but passing the class is 'Simple'. He gives well over 300+ bonus points.”
STATS13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

the book, and allow no partial credit.

Test-only gradesNo partial creditExtra credit heavyFormulas not always allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

no partial credit, and sometimes ban formula sheets.

No partial creditTests onlyLarge bonus pointsBook-mismatched tests
“The only thing you get graded on is the test so you don't get partial credit for anything else.”
MATH250
“he if you can't decipher cuz they have nothing to do with the book, you're screwed.”
MATH13
“He does not let you reference formulas during the tests, BUT 85-100 is an A”
MATH13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2016, highlighting test-only grading, self-teaching pressure, and polarized extra-credit experiences. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

28/100

“He was the .”

📝

28/100

“The only thing you get graded on is the test so you don't get partial credit for anything else.”

📚

35/100

“If . If you dont ave that ”

🎁 Lifeline

55/100

“He gives well over 300+ bonus points (which would give you a passing grade even if you failed the 1st 3 tests).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's like a robot teaching the class. and knowledgeable but not much of a professor.
  • Would go around questions instead of answering them clearly.
  • His whole lecture is based on the book which is super boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A! Only if you can teach your self.
  • There is no partial credit and .
  • He offers just as much as if you do the work

Theme 3

🚫 Strong Warnings

  • If you are in trig with .
  • .
  • , get another one

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across many years and courses show a strong, consistent pattern of and weak teaching quality.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH1313 reviews
MATH2503 reviews
STATS133 reviews
STAT132 reviews
MATH2021 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH501 review
STAT1 review
STAT11 review
STATS42611 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1