AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Robert Bobby Nakamoto

COUN207 · COUN20187 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will attend, write weekly, and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational mentorClear syllabusWeekly short papersCares about studentsMandatory attendance
  • Both recent reviews give him a 5 and an A, calling him inspirational and student-focused.
  • Workload is defined and steady with .
  • , but students say engagement pays off in support and takeaways.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Both students earned As, but and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit around 4 and weekly writing keeps the course from feeling effortless.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and link takeaways to regular engagement.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students call the class exceptional and and clarity.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Clear expectations and two reported As .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly short papers and defined work create a steady moderate load.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students call him inspirational, resourceful, and willing to go the extra yard with a fantastic attitude.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Reviews emphasize weekly short papers and defined work over exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person counseling sections feel structured and and weekly papers.

Main concern

heavy for light-load seekers.

What students said

“Bobby is a very inspirational Professor who cares about his students.”
COUN207
“The but get ready to submit a .”
COUN20187

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , so as standard.

Weekly short papersClear expectationsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and syllabus clarity without proving exam proctoring details.

Weekly short papersClear syllabusNo exam policy detail
“The but get ready to submit a .”
COUN20187

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was exceptional! The but get ready to submit a . Resourceful, insightful. fantastic attitude, willing to go the extra yard to assist you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews in 2016, highlighting care and structured weekly work. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Student Care

94/100

“Bobby is a very inspirational Professor who cares about his students.”

📋

90/100

“The but get ready to submit a .”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“Awesome!!!!”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Bobby is a very inspirational Professor who cares about his students.
  • fantastic attitude, willing to go the extra yard to assist you

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Structure

  • get ready to submit a
  • and if engaged and attending on a regular basis.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

Only two highly positive 2016 reviews limit confidence despite strong agreement and detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN201871 review
COUN2071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values