AI Rate Professor

English

McCabe Jones

ENGLISH5 · ENGLI5 · ENG5 · ENG1B · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want strict college-level writing critique and can handle a blunt, polarizing personality.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDetailed Essay FeedbackSarcastic and ArrogantCollege-Level StandardsPolarizing Personality
  • some praise college-level standards and and unhelpful.
  • Essays, revisions, and analysis drive the course more than easy busywork.
  • and unapproachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and analysis is common; average class grades as low as C appear in older reviews.

Online review also says essays were never good enough; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content difficulty varies by section, but intellectual challenge sits and writing.

; online noted moderate difficulty with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least as mandatory; most others do not expand on policy.

Mandatory attendance noted in one in-person ENGLISH5 review; online did not specify.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Roughly half the students praise standards and discussion while the other half strongly warn against him.

Online review is strongly against; in-person reviews are split between 4-5 and 1-2 quality ratings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and never good enough essay comments outweigh occasional revision and help.

Format shift

Online essays never good enough; in person tough but sometimes allows revisions.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Multiple essays, books, discussions, and revisions create a moderate writing load rather than light busywork.

Format shift

Both formats center on essays; online did not describe lighter load.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call him amazing for standards and discussion; others call him arrogant, unhelpful, and boring.

Format shift

Online experience was poor; in-person views are highly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course is driven by essays, revisions, text analysis, and discussion rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern appears online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

admirers value tough standards and and .

Main concern

Arrogant tone and scaffolding.

What students said

“Made more comments than any professor on my essays. , but gave me plenty of chances to revise and offered .”
ENGLISH5
“ .”
ENG5
“He's a complete jerk. Very arrogant always complaining that he had no time to read our revisions.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online ENG5 , and not approachable.

Main concern

Unclear expectations and .

What students said

“Mr. , and was not very clear about what he was expecting from us. .”
ENG5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay and analysis focused; reviews do not clearly prove traditional proctored exams.

Essay HeavyRevision OpportunitiesText Analysis

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on essays, revisions, books, and .

Essay HeavyRevision OpportunitiesText Analysis
“Made more comments than any professor on my essays. , but gave me plenty of chances to revise and offered .”
ENGLISH5
“All this aside no ones analysis was good enough for him and the average grade of the class was C.”
ENG1B

Online

Online comments focus on essay expectations and .

Essay Heavy
“The .”
ENG5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Made more comments than any professor on my essays. , but gave me plenty of chances to revise and offered .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (1 online, 9 in person), highlighting split opinions on standards vs personality. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Teaching

48/100

“People hate on him is because he actually expects college level work”

📝

32/100

“ , but gave me plenty of chances to revise and offered .”

👎 Personality Complaints

40/100

“He is sarcastic and arrogant. Definitely a rookie professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he really loves to hear himself talk
  • Jones is a great teacher, the topics were aligned with current events
  • very arrogant and has no patience for explaining things

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but gave me plenty of chances to revise
  • the average grade of the class was C
  • Graded too hard and didn't help us improve

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews spanning 2010-2016 with rich detail and consistent split between praise for standards and complaints about arrogance.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG54 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
ENGLISH52 reviews
239041 review
ENGLI51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values