AI Rate Professor

Physics

Calvin Berggren

PHYSICS4A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the course experience is described as failing students.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDo Not TakeImpossible HomeworkLow Exam AveragesBehind on LecturesCondescending
  • The only review reports chronically behind lectures and poor coordination with lab.
  • , with exam averages around 35%.
  • Student and frames him as career-focused over teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Exam averages around 35% and .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Physics content plus weak lecture pace and .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only student review ends with an .

All evidence is from the single in-person review; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Very low exam averages and a .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

as nearly impossible relative to what was taught in class.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Behind lectures, weak lab communication, and condescension dominate the only available account.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams are called out as a central failure point with a 35% average.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person PHYSICS4A review describes lagging lectures, , and a condescending tone.

Main concern

, and poor student support.

What students said

“the received in the class), and the average on his exams was 35%”
PHYSICS4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

reported class averages around 35%.

Low Exam AveragesMisaligned with Instruction

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard versus what lectures prepared students for.

Exam Average About 35%Homework Misaligned
“the average on his exams was 35%”
PHYSICS4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Calvin was always behind in his lectures, failed to communicate properly with the lab instructor”

📉

8/100

“the average on his exams was 35%”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always behind in his lectures
  • failed to communicate properly with the lab instructor
  • occasionally condescending

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the
  • the average on his exams was 35%

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • more interested in furthering his career than being a professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older review exists, so but statistically weak.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYSICS4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values