AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

A Young

COUN224 · COUN57 · TRNFRPREP · CAREE2097 · COUN221 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can handle last-minute work with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedLast-Minute AssignmentsMandatory AttendanceUnclear ExpectationsCareer Class Chaos
  • Most students describe her as , and .
  • Attendance and a few large graded items dominate; missing class or tests hurts badly.
  • A minority see career-planning value, but many say go to the transfer center instead.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A few large projects and and little balance from homework.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is not advanced, but last-minute novels and should be.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Tags and comments stress that skipping class or missing in-class tests means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviews and to use the transfer or career center instead.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Grades hinge on a few big items with shifting rules and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students report few but , and uneven workload spikes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Reviews repeatedly call her unprepared, late with , and sometimes condescending.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

In-class tests and a small number of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person counseling and career , and low value compared with campus centers.

Main concern

, and disruptive class management.

What students said

“Superrrrrr lazy, ... , if you don't want fail”
COUN57
“Gives and no homework to balance out grade”
COUN57
“She brought her 5 yr old grand-daughter to class, for the entire class time twice”
CAREE2097

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment relies on in-class tests and a handful of .

In-Class TestsFew Graded ItemsProject Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a few major assignments with .

In-Class TestsFew Graded ItemsProject Heavy
“Complete all in ”
COUN57
“Gives and no homework to balance out grade so grade is based on these three assignments”
COUN57

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , if you don't want fail. Superrrrrr lazy, , and she did know who you are after semester done.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person , and low value. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Her teaching is nothing short of terrible. She clearly does not know how to teach.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“Go to the Transfer and Career Center instead; you will get more complete and accurate information”

📅

15/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

📦

35/100

“She will assign a novel one week and EXPECTS ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always unprepared and she makes no attempt to correct this habit
  • she has no idea how to conduct a classroom
  • I really have no idea what she wanted from us

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS
  • grade is
  • Pretty easy class for what you get out of it

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Management

  • She brought her 5 yr old grand-daughter to class
  • last minute
  • very condescending and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen mostly detailed negative reviews across several years form a consistent picture of poor organization and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COUN5711 reviews
CAREE20971 review
COUN2211 review
COUN2241 review
TRNFRPREP1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1