AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marilyn Koshlap

MATH201 · MATH60 · MATH1 · MATH13 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you already learn math independently; many students report , and tough grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMany mistakes in classHeavy online homeworkTough gradingTeach yourselfHigh drop rate
  • , and a poor fit if you struggle with math.
  • Workload and as heavy and unhelpful.
  • A minority of students still , and helpful videos.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some say tests are not hard and one student still got a B after failing two tests, but and .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Many students call the and say math stays hard even when tests are not brutal.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

One student says you do not have to attend because slides and .

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most reviews tell students not to take her despite a few strong positive outliers.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report tough grading and as extremely hard.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple reviews and websites that do not help.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme , and needing outside tutoring or self-study.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Heavy online homework plus exams that sometimes include untaught surprises.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person students report rushed explanations, , and , while a few praise her organization and videos.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She is the . Literally half the people dropped her class.”
MATH1
“She is a great teacher, her schedule is clear, she answers any questions, in person and e-mail.”
MATH60
“ but she grades pretty tough.”
MATH201
“you'll have to teach yourself.”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mentioned as sometimes surprising and not always hard, with .

In-person examsSurprise exam contentTests not always hard

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention exams with occasional surprise content and .

In-person examsSurprise exam contentTests not always hard
“Surprises you with !”
MATH1
“ but she grades pretty tough.”
MATH201
“ study.”
MATH13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . BUT HER WORKLOAD IS WAY TOO MUCH.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, weighting the majority negative teaching and workload themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She is the .”

📚 Workload

24/100

“HER WORKLOAD IS WAY TOO MUCH.”

⚖️ Grading

30/100

“ but she grades pretty tough.”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“She is a great .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There was times she spent 30 min doing things wrong.
  • you'll have to teach yourself.
  • Everyday there were constant mistakes made by the professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Surprises you with !
  • but she grades pretty tough.
  • and still received a B.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • HER WORKLOAD IS WAY TOO MUCH.
  • you do so
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but two strong positive outliers.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH133 reviews
MATH12 reviews
MATH2012 reviews
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1