AI Rate Professor

Economics

Michael Cullen

ECON305 · ECON2 · ECON101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless and tolerate mandatory, low-value lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads textbook slidesMandatory worthless attendancePoor explanationsRude and lateAvoid
  • Students and adds almost no original teaching value.
  • re-reading chapters.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

, but and weak teaching make a clean A feel like hard work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material is not intrinsically advanced, yet weak teaching and bad tests make the course feel harder than it should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

class is just reading the textbook slides.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Comments call him a horrible teacher and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

No signs of ; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Main work is chapter reading, but mandatory class time and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and comes off rude and late.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pain .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Econ sections are described as slide-reading, rude, and hard to learn from, with .

Main concern

and poorly worded tests while .

What students said

“he use the and directly reads from them.”
ECON305
“tests are VERY poorly .”
ECON2
“Rude, always late, bitter and lame jokes.”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as poorly worded and hard to navigate without strong teaching support.

Poorly worded tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not prove lockdown software or .

Poorly worded tests
“tests are VERY poorly .”
ECON2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this class is one of the . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person , and bad tests. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“he is a HORRIBLE teacher. tests are VERY poorly .”

📚 Slide-Only Lectures

20/100

“he use the and directly reads from them.”

🚫

12/100

“he makes the class mandatory, even though all you need to do is read.”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“this class is one of the . !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he use the and directly reads from them.
  • .
  • Rude, always late, bitter and lame jokes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • all you have to do is read the chapters and it should be easy.
  • this class is one of the .

Theme 3

🚪

  • he makes the class mandatory, even though all you need to do is read.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old 2006-2007 reviews, all negative-to-mediocre, with limited grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON1011 review
ECON21 review
ECON3051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values