AI Rate Professor

English

Bill Crossman

ENG05 · ENGL5 · ENG5 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will put real work into journals and essays and can handle slow lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardJournal and three essaysSlow lecturesFair paper gradingCan be boringHard but rewarding
  • Grades rest .
  • Some students grew as writers; others found lectures a long snooze.
  • Difficulty and satisfaction split hard versus relatively easy A if you tolerate boredom.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Hard work on journals and , but another path is a relatively easy A if you endure boredom.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from hard thinking-and-writing challenge to low-interest required English with moderate intellectual load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Praise for and growth is offset by bad-teacher and snooze-fest complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Paper prompts are broad and in work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Ongoing journal plus three essays creates steady writing work without sounding overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Interesting discussion content for some, but slow boring lectures and one flat bad-teacher review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade depends on journals and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and growth with slow, boring lectures and uneven difficulty.

Main concern

Three-hour slow lectures and uninteresting prompts can feel like a snooze fest.

What students said

“Work hard and you will be rewarded. You reap what you sow!”
ENG5
“ .”
ENGL5
“If you dont mind being bored to tears if it means a relatively easy A, then go ahead...”
ENG05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on journals and .

JournalsThree essaysVideo-based prompts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe journals and three essays as the grade base, with .

JournalsThree essays
“Besides the and reading handouts.”
ENG5
“Grades depend on "journals" and three essays...”
ENG05

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Work hard and you will be rewarded. You reap what you sow!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and mixed payoff. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Interesting content makes for good class discussions, but he is a little slow in getting to the point.”

📝 Assessment Load

48/100

“Besides the and reading handouts.”

😴 Boredom Risk

35/100

“omg....what a SNOOOOOOOZE FEST!!!”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“All in all pretty good for a required class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does boring, very slow-lectures and then prepares useless group-work.
  • Interesting content makes for good class discussions
  • bad teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Work hard and you will be rewarded.
  • .
  • a relatively easy A

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • One must keep a journal of the goings-on in and word lists.
  • Grades depend on "journals" and three essays

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Four mixed 2007-2009 reviews with sharp disagreement and little grade distribution data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL52 reviews
ENG051 review
ENG51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values