AI Rate Professor

English

Bernabe Mendoza

ENG1A · ENGL1B · ENG1B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him only if you can and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh GraderExtra Credit OfferedStudent-Run LecturesFocused Essay StyleMixed Discussion Skills
  • Grades harshly but offers and .
  • Writing must stay tightly focused on one argument with little help on craft.
  • Summer section felt fun and helpful; regular sections felt rigid on interpretation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and an , but students say he grades essays harshly unless you write exactly his way.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is standard English composition and literature, not conceptually brutal, though pacing and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews never clearly .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Some students call him fun and helpful while and limited essay help.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students note limited essay coaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Essays and reading are expected; summer had a lot of work but an and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Helpful and fun for some, but weak seminar leadership and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on focused essays and texts, with an .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and uneven discussion leadership; summer felt lively while other terms felt rigid.

Main concern

improve.

What students said

“Write like he wants you to and you will do fine. ! And he offered . Nice guy, grades harsh.”
ENG1B
“He gives very little help with essays. He just tells you to make it focused”
ENGL1B
“I loved this professor, he was so much fun. I took his summer class, it was a lot of work but mostly student run lectures about books.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Writing and essay and rather than strict proctored exams.

Optional Final EssayEssay-Focused AssessmentExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe essay-centered grading with an and .

Optional Final EssayEssay-Focused AssessmentExtra Credit
“ ! And he offered .”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Write like he wants you to and you will do fine. ! And he offered . Nice guy, grades harsh.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning late 2011, highlighting essay strictness and mixed seminar style. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

42/100

“Make one argument and stick to it do not veer off topic whatsoever and do not summarize!”

⚖️ Harsh But Offers Breaks

32/100

“ .”

🎭 Mixed Classroom Energy

58/100

“I loved this professor, he was so much fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't know how to run a discussion seminar.
  • He isn't open to interpretations of a novel that differ from his.
  • mostly student run lectures about books

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades harsh
  • !
  • He gives very little help with essays.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Nice guy
  • he
  • He even let us have potlucks!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed in-person reviews from 2011 give mixed but concrete evidence; sample is small and old.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values