AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jadu Jagel

PSYCH1A · PHY1A · PSYCH10 · PSYPSY · PSYCH101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

; only consider if and want a low-effort grade path.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAlways lateRead the textbookCan't teachDisorganized lecturesSelf-study required
  • Students overwhelmingly say lectures are late, unfocused, and nearly useless.
  • Tests come from the textbook, so .
  • reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and make an A easy even when lectures fail.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is manageable from the textbook, though classroom chaos inflates perceived difficulty for some.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

He is often late yet objects when students leave early, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students say he cannot teach and urge others to find a different instructor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Book-based tests, homework, and , though a few call grading arbitrary.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Light

72/100

Core work is reading the textbook with limited meaningful lecture demand.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Reviews hammer chronic lateness, tangents, disorganization, and almost no usable classroom teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students say with little lecture alignment.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person psych classes are described as chronically late and than lectures.

Main concern

You learn almost nothing in class and must survive chaotic, off-topic sessions.

What students said

“You can learn in his class, but don't expect to learn anything in the actual classroom-- just read the textbook.”
PSYCH1A
“No need to pay attention to his lectures because . ... .”
PSYCH1A
“Overall It was a complete waste of time and money.”
PSYCH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as textbook-derived rather than lecture-based, with .

Textbook-based testsMini tests from bookExtra credit available

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; lectures do not prepare you.

Textbook-based testsExtra creditHomework assignments
“ (really).”
PSYCH1A
“ . I just worked on other hw during class. He gives opportunities and a couple of homework assignments.”
PSYCH1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If , those four hours will make you want to kill yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting poor lectures and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“He can't, won't and I think is unable to teach.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ !!”

📚

80/100

“No need to pay attention to his lectures because .”

🅰️ Grade Path

78/100

“Just attend class, read the book, do , hw, and you will easily earn an A.”

Theme 1

⏰ About Class Management

  • Always late for class by four to fourteen minutes
  • He was late every day to class
  • Changes the silibus at will

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • you won't learn a thing
  • complete waste of time and money
  • !

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Tests

  • tests ... are easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2010-2011 repeatedly cite lateness, weak teaching, and book-based tests.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

PSYCH1A12 reviews
PHY1A1 review
PSYCH101 review
PSYCH1011 review
PSYPSY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values